fscrypt_is_bounce_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_is_bounce_page()
and fscrypt_pagecache_folio() is the equivalent of fscrypt_pagecache_page().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324180129.1220691-3-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This particular combination of flags is used by most filesystems
in their ->write_begin method, although it does find use in a
few other places. Before folios, it warranted its own function
(grab_cache_page_write_begin()), but I think that just having specialised
flags is enough. It certainly helps the few places that have been
converted from grab_cache_page_write_begin() to __filemap_get_folio().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324180129.1220691-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Earlier, inode PAs were stored in a linked list. This caused a need to
periodically trim the list down inorder to avoid growing it to a very
large size, as this would severly affect performance during list
iteration.
Recent patches changed this list to an rbtree, and since the tree scales
up much better, we no longer need to have the trim functionality, hence
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c409addceaa3ade4b40328e28e3b54b2f259689e.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently, the kernel uses i_prealloc_list to hold all the inode
preallocations. This is known to cause degradation in performance in
workloads which perform large number of sparse writes on a single file.
This is mainly because functions like ext4_mb_normalize_request() and
ext4_mb_use_preallocated() iterate over this complete list, resulting in
slowdowns when large number of PAs are present.
Patch 27bc446e2 partially fixed this by enforcing a limit of 512 for
the inode preallocation list and adding logic to continually trim the
list if it grows above the threshold, however our testing revealed that
a hardcoded value is not suitable for all kinds of workloads.
To optimize this, add an rbtree to the inode and hold the inode
preallocations in this rbtree. This will make iterating over inode PAs
faster and scale much better than a linked list. Additionally, we also
had to remove the LRU logic that was added during trimming of the list
(in ext4_mb_release_context()) as it will add extra overhead in rbtree.
The discards now happen in the lowest-logical-offset-first order.
** Locking notes **
With the introduction of rbtree to maintain inode PAs, we can't use RCU
to walk the tree for searching since it can result in partial traversals
which might miss some nodes(or entire subtrees) while discards happen
in parallel (which happens under a lock). Hence this patch converts the
ei->i_prealloc_lock spin_lock to rw_lock.
Almost all the codepaths that read/modify the PA rbtrees are protected
by the higher level inode->i_data_sem (except
ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations() and ext4_clear_inode()) IIUC, the
only place we need lock protection is when one thread is reading
"searching" the PA rbtree (earlier protected under rcu_read_lock()) and
another is "deleting" the PAs in ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()
function (which iterates all the PAs using the grp->bb_prealloc_list and
deletes PAs from the tree without taking any inode lock (i_data_sem)).
So, this patch converts all rcu_read_lock/unlock() paths for inode list
PA to use read_lock() and all places where we were using
ei->i_prealloc_lock spinlock will now be using write_lock().
Note that this makes the fast path (searching of the right PA e.g.
ext4_mb_use_preallocated() or ext4_mb_normalize_request()), now use
read_lock() instead of rcu_read_lock/unlock(). Ths also will now block
due to slow discard path (ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()) which
uses write_lock().
But this is not as bad as it looks. This is because -
1. The slow path only occurs when the normal allocation failed and we
can say that we are low on disk space. One can argue this scenario
won't be much frequent.
2. ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations(), locks and unlocks the rwlock
for deleting every individual PA. This gives enough opportunity for
the fast path to acquire the read_lock for searching the PA inode
list.
Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4137bce8f6948fedd8bae134dabae24acfe699c6.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
** Splitting pa->pa_inode_list **
Currently, we use the same pa->pa_inode_list to add a pa to either
the inode preallocation list or the locality group preallocation list.
For better clarity, split this list into a union of 2 list_heads and use
either of the them based on the type of pa.
** Splitting pa->pa_obj_lock **
Currently, pa->pa_obj_lock is either assigned &ei->i_prealloc_lock for
inode PAs or lg_prealloc_lock for lg PAs, and is then used to lock the
lists containing these PAs. Make the distinction between the 2 PA types
clear by changing this lock to a union of 2 locks. Explicitly use the
pa_lock_node.inode_lock for inode PAs and pa_lock_node.lg_lock for lg
PAs.
This patch is required so that the locality group preallocation code
remains the same as in upcoming patches we are going to make changes to
inode preallocation code to move from list to rbtree based
implementation. This patch also makes it easier to review the upcoming
patches.
There are no functional changes in this patch.
Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1d7ac0557e998c3fc7eef422b52e4bc67bdef2b0.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When the length of best extent found is less than the length of goal extent
we need to make sure that the best extent atleast covers the start of the
original request. This is done by adjusting the ac_b_ex.fe_logical (logical
start) of the extent.
While doing so, the current logic sometimes results in the best extent's
logical range overflowing the goal extent. Since this best extent is later
added to the inode preallocation list, we have a possibility of introducing
overlapping preallocations. This is discussed in detail here [1].
As per Jan's suggestion, to fix this, replace the existing logic with the
below logic for adjusting best extent as it keeps fragmentation in check
while ensuring logical range of best extent doesn't overflow out of goal
extent:
1. Check if best extent can be kept at end of goal range and still cover
original start.
2. Else, check if best extent can be kept at start of goal range and still
cover original start.
3. Else, keep the best extent at start of original request.
Also, add a few extra BUG_ONs that might help catch errors faster.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y+OGkVvzPN0RMv0O@li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f96aca6d415b36d1f90db86c1a8cd7e2e9d7ab0e.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Abstract out the logic of fixing PA overlaps in ext4_mb_normalize_request
to improve readability of code. This also makes it easier to make changes
to the overlap logic in future.
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9b35f3955a1d7b66bbd713eca1e63026e01f78c1.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Abstract out the logic to double check for overlaps in normalize_pa to
a separate function. Since there has been no reports in past where we
have seen any overlaps which hits this bug_on(), in future we can
consider calling this function under "#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK" only.
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/35dd5d94fa0b2d1cd2d2947adf8967279c72967d.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Change some variable names to be more consistent and
refactor some of the code to make it easier to read.
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8edcab489c06cf861b19d87207d9b0ff7ac7f3c1.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch makes the following changes:
* Rename ext4_mb_pa_free to ext4_mb_pa_put_free
to better reflect its purpose
* Add new ext4_mb_pa_free() which only handles freeing
* Refactor ext4_mb_pa_callback() to use ext4_mb_pa_free()
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b273bc9cbf5bd278f641fa5bc6c0cc9e6cb3330c.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If we come across a PA that matches the logical offset but is unable to
satisfy a non-extent file due to its physical start being higher than
that supported by non extent files, then simply stop searching for
another PA and break out of loop. This is because, since PAs don't
overlap, we won't be able to find another inode PA which can satisfy the
original request.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/42404ca29bd304ae2c962184c3c32a02e8eefcd0.1679731817.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Result of EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb) is already stored in sbi at beginning of
ext4_mb_normalize_request. Use sbi instead of EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb) to
remove unnecessary pointer dereference.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230311170949.1047958-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We try to allocate a block from goal in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple. We
only need get blkoff in first group with goal and set blkoff to 0 for
the rest groups.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-21-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Call trace to assign ac_f_ex:
ext4_mb_use_best_found
ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex;
ext4_mb_new_preallocation
ext4_mb_new_group_pa
ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex;
ext4_mb_new_inode_pa
ac->ac_f_ex = ac->ac_b_ex;
Actually allocated blocks is already stored in ac_f_ex in
ext4_mb_use_best_found, so there is no need to assign ac_f_ex
in ext4_mb_new_group_pa and ext4_mb_new_inode_pa.
Just remove repeat assignment to ac_f_ex in ext4_mb_new_group_pa
and ext4_mb_new_inode_pa.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-19-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When ext4_read_block_bitmap fails, we can return PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh) to
remove unnecessary NULL check of bitmap_bh.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-18-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We goto exit_meta_group_info only to return -ENOMEM. Return -ENOMEM
directly instead of goto to remove this unnecessary tag.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If any bex which meets bex->fe_len >= gex->fe_len is found, then it will
always be used when complex scan of group that bex belongs to finishs.
So there will not be any lock-unlock period.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-15-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Only call trace of ext4_mb_check_limits is as following:
ext4_mb_complex_scan_group
ext4_mb_measure_extent
ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 0);
ext4_mb_check_limits(ac, e4b, 1);
If the first ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_max_to_scan check in
ext4_mb_check_limits is met, we will set ac_status to
AC_STATUS_BREAK and call ext4_mb_try_best_found to try to use
ac->ac_b_ex.
If ext4_mb_try_best_found successes, then block allocation finishs,
the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is not reachable.
If ext4_mb_try_best_found fails, then we set EXT4_MB_HINT_FIRST and
reset ac->ac_b_ex to retry block allocation. We will use any found
free extent in ext4_mb_measure_extent before reach the removed
ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check.
In summary, the removed ac->ac_found > sbi->s_mb_min_to_scan check is
not reachable and we can remove that dead check.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-14-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We always adjust first to even number and adjust last to odd number, so
first == last will never happen. Remove this dead check.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-13-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
1. remove unnecessary ac check:
We always go to out tag before ac is successfully allocated, then we can
move out tag after free of ac and remove NULL check of ac.
2. remove unnecessary *errp check:
We always go to errout tag if *errp is non-zero, then we can move errout
tag into error handle if *errp is non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-12-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
e4b->bd_buddy_page is only set if we initialize ext4_buddy successfully. So
e4b->bd_buddy_page is always NULL in error handle branch. Just remove the
dead check.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-11-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If we alloc array of buffer_head failed, there is no resource need to be
freed and we can simpily return error.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-10-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Return value static function ext4_mb_try_best_found and
ext4_mb_free_metadata is not used. Just remove unused return value.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-9-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used fails in ext4_mb_new_blocks, we may
discard pa already in list. Protect pa with pa_lock to avoid race.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
As we don't correct pa_lstart here, so there is no need to subtract
pa_lstart with consumed len.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We will add pa_free to s_mb_preallocated when new ext4_prealloc_space is
created. In ext4_mb_new_inode_pa, we will call ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
before adding pa_free to s_mb_preallocated. However, ext4_mb_use_inode_pa
will consume pa_free for block allocation which triggerred the creation
of ext4_prealloc_space. Add pa_free to s_mb_preallocated before
ext4_mb_use_inode_pa to correct calculation of s_mb_preallocated.
There is no such problem in ext4_mb_new_group_pa as pa_free of group pa
is consumed in ext4_mb_release_context instead of ext4_mb_use_group_pa.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We always get ext4_group_desc with group + 1 and ext4_group_info with
group to check if we need do initialize ext4_group_info for the group.
Just get ext4_group_desc with group for ext4_group_info initialization
check.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set, ext4_mb_regular_allocator will only
allocate blocks from ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Allow to find by goal in
ext4_mb_find_by_goal if EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is set or allocation
with EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY set will always fail.
EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY is not used at all, so the problem is not
found for now.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We need to set ac_g_ex to notify the goal start used in
ext4_mb_find_by_goal. Set ac_g_ex instead of ac_f_ex in
ext4_mb_normalize_request.
Besides we should assure goal start is in range [first_data_block,
blocks_count) as ext4_mb_initialize_context does.
[ Added a check to make sure size is less than ar->pright; otherwise
we could end up passing an underflowed value of ar->pright - size to
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(), which will trigger a BUG_ON later on.
- TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172120.3800725-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove unused group parameter in ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set. After this,
group parameter in ext4_set_bitmap_checksums is also not used, just
remove it too.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221203027.2359920-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
As inode table blocks are contiguous, inode table blocks inside the
block_group can be represented as range [itbl_cluster_start,
itbl_cluster_last]. Then we can simply account inode table cluters and
check cluster overlap with [itbl_cluster_start, itbl_cluster_last]
instead of traverse each block of inode table.
By the way, this patch fixes code style problem of comment for
ext4_num_overhead_clusters.
[ Merged fix-up patch which fixed potentially access to an
uninitialzied stack variable. --TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303171446.eLEhZzAu-lkp@intel.com/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
For case we initialize a bitmap bh, we will set bitmap bh verified.
We can return immediately instead of goto verify to remove unnecessary
work for trying to verify bitmap bh.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-7-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Commit bdfb6ff4a2 ("ext4: mark group corrupt on group descriptor
checksum") added flag to indicate corruption of group instead of
marking all blocks used. Just remove stale comment.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We only call ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa if there is no meta_bg feature or group
does not reach first_meta_bg, so group must not reside in meta group. Then
group has a global gdt if superblock exists. Just remove confusing branch
that meta_bg feature exists.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters is already aware of meta_bg feature and test
if block_group is inside real meta block groups before calling
ext4_bg_num_gdb. Then ext4_bg_num_gdb will check if block group is inside
a real meta block groups again to decide either ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or
ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa is needed.
Call ext4_bg_num_gdb_meta or ext4_bg_num_gdb_nometa directly after we
check if block_group is inside a meta block groups in
ext4_num_base_meta_clusters to remove redundant check of meta block
groups in ext4_bg_num_gdb.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
1.Last valid cluster of inode table is EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset +
sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1). We should make sure last valid cluster is <
max_bit, i.e., EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) is <
max_bit rather than EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) is
< max_bit.
2.Bit search length should be last valid cluster plus 1, i.e.,
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) + 1 rather than
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group).
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We mark buffer_head of bitmap successfully initialized even error occurs
in ext4_init_block_bitmap. Although we will return error, we will get a
invalid buffer_head of bitmap from next ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait
which is marked buffer_verified but not successfully initialized actually
in previous ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait.
Fix this by only marking buffer_head successfully initialized if
ext4_init_block_bitmap successes.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230221115919.1918161-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Test generic/390 in data=journal mode often triggers a warning that
ext4_do_writepages() tries to start a transaction on frozen filesystem.
This happens because although all dirty data is properly written, jbd2
checkpointing code writes data through submit_bh() and as a result only
buffer dirty bits are cleared but page dirty bits stay set. Later when
the filesystem is frozen, writeback code comes, tries to write
supposedly dirty pages and the warning triggers. Fix the problem by
calling sync_filesystem() once more after flushing the whole journal to
clear stray page dirty bits.
[ Applied fixup patches to address crashes when running data=journal
tests; see links for more details -- TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308142528.12384-1-jack@suse.cz
Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230319183617.GA896@sol.localdomain
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323145404.21381-1-jack@suse.cz
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323145404.21381-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add support for writeback of journalled data directly into
ext4_writepages() instead of offloading it to write_cache_pages(). This
actually significantly simplifies the code and reduces code duplication.
For checkpointing of committed data we can use ext4_writepages()
rightaway the same way as writeback of ordered data uses it on
transaction commit. For journalling of dirty mapped pages, we need to
add a special case to mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() to add all page
buffers to the journal.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228051319.4085470-8-tytso@mit.edu
In case mpage_submit_page() returns error, it doesn't really matter
whether we call mpage_page_done() and then return error or whether we
return directly because in that case page cleanup will be done by
mpage_release_unused_pages() instead. Logically, it makes more sense to
leave the cleanup to mpage_release_unused_pages() because we didn't
succeed in writing the page. So move mpage_page_done() calls after the
error handling.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228051319.4085470-7-tytso@mit.edu
Move page unlocking during page writeback out of mpage_submit_page()
into the callers. This will allow writeback in data=journal mode to keep
the page locked for a bit longer. Since page unlocking it tightly
connected to increment of mpd->first_page (as that determines cleanup of
locked but unwritten pages), move page unlocking as well as
mpd->first_page handling into a helper function.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228051319.4085470-6-tytso@mit.edu
Matthew Wilcox
Ojaswin Mujoo
Theodore Ts'o
Kemeng Shi
Jan Kara