Граф коммитов

19 Коммитов

Автор SHA1 Сообщение Дата
Jeff King 1ddf5efc66 prune-packed: only show progress when stderr is a tty
This matches the behavior of other git programs, and helps
keep cruft out of things like cron job output.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-23 21:29:45 -08:00
Stephen Boyd 7cfe0c9802 prune-packed: migrate to parse-options
Add long options for dry run and quiet to be more consistent with the
rest of git.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-10 23:57:21 -07:00
Alex Riesen 691f1a28bf replace direct calls to unlink(2) with unlink_or_warn
This helps to notice when something's going wrong, especially on
systems which lock open files.

I used the following criteria when selecting the code for replacement:
- it was already printing a warning for the unlink failures
- it is in a function which already printing something or is
  called from such a function
- it is in a static function, returning void and the function is only
  called from a builtin main function (cmd_)
- it is in a function which handles emergency exit (signal handlers)
- it is in a function which is obvously cleaning up the lockfiles

Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-29 18:37:41 -07:00
Johannes Sixt 531e6daa03 prune-packed: advanced progress even for non-existing fan-out directories
A progress indicator is used to count through the 256 object fan-out
directories while unused object files are removed. (However, it becomes
visible only if this process takes long enough.)

Previously, display_progress() was only called if object files were
actually removed. But if directories towards the end (fd/, fe/, ff/) did
not exist, this could leave a strange line

   Removing duplicate objects:  99% (255/256), done.

in the terminal instead of the expected "100% (256/256)".

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-27 01:06:35 -07:00
Junio C Hamano cd673c1f17 has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
Most of the callers of this function except only one pass NULL to its last
parameter, ignore_packed.

Introduce has_sha1_kept_pack() function that has the function signature
and the semantics of this function, and convert the sole caller that does
not pass NULL to call this new function.

All other callers and has_sha1_pack() lose the ignore_packed parameter.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28 01:06:06 -08:00
Stephan Beyer 1b1dd23f2d Make usage strings dash-less
When you misuse a git command, you are shown the usage string.
But this is currently shown in the dashed form.  So if you just
copy what you see, it will not work, when the dashed form
is no longer supported.

This patch makes git commands show the dash-less version.

For shell scripts that do not specify OPTIONS_SPEC, git-sh-setup.sh
generates a dash-less usage string now.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13 14:12:48 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 54352bb274 Remove now unnecessary 'sync()' calls
Since the pack-files are now always created stably on disk, there is no
need to sync() before pruning lose objects or old stale pack-files.

[jc: with Nico's clean-up]

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-31 14:49:29 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre 93ff3f6a53 return the prune-packed progress display to the inner loop
This reverts commit 0e54913796 so to return
to the same state as commit b5d72f0a4c.

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> During my testing with a 40,000 loose object case (yea, I fully
> unpacked a git.git clone I had laying around) my system stalled
> hard in the first object directory.  A *lot* longer than 1 second.
> So I got no progress meter for a long time, and then a progress
> meter appeared on the second directory.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-01 15:22:32 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre 4d4fcc5451 relax usage of the progress API
Since it is now OK to pass a null pointer to display_progress() and
stop_progress() resulting in a no-op, then we can simplify the code
and remove a bunch of lines by not making those calls conditional all
the time.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30 16:08:40 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre dc6a0757c4 make struct progress an opaque type
This allows for better management of progress "object" existence,
as well as making the progress display implementation more independent
from its callers.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30 16:08:40 -07:00
Nicolas Pitre 0e54913796 prune-packed: don't call display_progress() for every file
The progress count is per fanout directory, so it is useless to call
it for every file as the count doesn't change that often.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30 16:08:40 -07:00
Shawn O. Pearce b5d72f0a4c Teach prune-packed to use the standard progress meter
Rather than reimplementing the progress meter logic and always
showing 100 lines of output while pruning already packed objects
we now use a delayed progress meter and only show it if there are
enough objects to make us take a little while.

Most users won't see the message anymore as it usually doesn't take
very long to delete the already packed loose objects.  This neatens
the output of a git-gc or git-repack execution, which is especially
important for a `git gc --auto` triggered from within another
command.

We perform the display_progress() call from within the very innermost
loop in case we spend more than 1 second within any single object
directory.  This ensures that a progress_update event from the
timer will still trigger in a timely fashion and allow the user to
see the progress meter.

While I'm in here I changed the message to be more descriptive of
its actual task.  "Removing unused objects" is a little scary for
new users as they wonder where these unused objects came from and
how they should avoid them.  Truth is these objects aren't unused
in the sense of what git-prune would call a dangling object, these
are used but are just duplicates of things we have already stored
in a packfile.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-10-19 00:28:44 -04:00
Matthias Lederhofer bd67f09f6d prune-packed: add -q to usage
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-18 14:30:05 -08:00
Junio C Hamano b60daf0515 Make git-prune-packed a bit more chatty.
Steven Grimm noticed that git-repack's verbosity is inconsistent
because pack-objects is chatty and prune-packed is not.  This
makes the latter a bit more chatty and gives -q option to
squelch it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-12 15:10:29 -08:00
Alexandre Julliard 2bb10fe51e prune-packed: Fix uninitialized variable.
The dryrun variable was made local instead of static by the previous
commit, and local variables aren't initialized to zero.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-23 13:19:18 -07:00
J. Bruce Fields 2eb53e65bd Make prune also run prune-packed
Both the git-prune manpage and everday.txt say that git-prune should also prune
unpacked objects that are also found in packs, by running git prune-packed.

Junio thought this was "a regression when prune was rewritten as a built-in."

So modify prune to call prune-packed again.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
2006-10-22 16:39:58 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 106d710bc1 pack-objects --unpacked=<existing pack> option.
Incremental repack without -a essentially boils down to:

	rev-list --objects --unpacked --all |
        pack-objects $new_pack

which picks up all loose objects that are still live and creates
a new pack.

This implements --unpacked=<existing pack> option to tell the
revision walking machinery to pretend as if objects in such a
pack are unpacked for the purpose of object listing.  With this,
we could say:

	rev-list --objects --unpacked=$active_pack --all |
	pack-objects $new_pack

instead, to mean "all live loose objects but pretend as if
objects that are in this pack are also unpacked".  The newly
created pack would be perfect for updating $active_pack by
replacing it.

Since pack-objects now knows how to do the rev-list's work
itself internally, you can also write the above example by:

	pack-objects --unpacked=$active_pack --all $new_pack </dev/null

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-07 02:46:03 -07:00
Matthias Kestenholz 25f38f064f use declarations from builtin.h for builtin commands
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kestenholz <matthias@spinlock.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-02 17:05:21 -07:00
Matthias Kestenholz 53bb2c002a Make git-prune-packed a builtin
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kestenholz <matthias@spinlock.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-02 11:36:01 -07:00