Actually the check of restyle count after associating with the nsIFrame is
not a problem in this test. The purpose of this test is to check no restyles
when the target element has no associated nsIFrame.
We will fix the defect in bug 866411.
MozReview-Commit-ID: BFRJsbTGdkh
This also makes depth-textures follow filtering rules, whereas before we
allowed filtered depth textures for WEBGL_depth_texture.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LxepCb4WEkr
Otherwise, when a glyph changes, we might end up doing too much work, destroying
the text-run and the observer that dirtied the frame, causing an assertion when
trying to delete it from the observer set.
MozReview-Commit-ID: LMQVr6pYFVM
In practice this will be the 'agent' level rather than the 'author' level, given
the SetParsingMode call immediately after creating the stylesheet. This change
aligns behavior with CSSStyleSheet::ReparseSheet.
This also modifies the windows widget code to use this new helper function, as
it avoids an unnecessary round-trip where a MultiTouchInput gets converted to
a WidgetTouchEvent (in nsWindow.cpp) and then back to a MultiTouchInput (in
APZCTreeManager.cpp)
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1WGbfINTW6c
On desktop, the context menu is shown when the user lifts their finger after
a long press, but only if the eMouseLongTap event is not cancelled. So by
not cancelling it, we allow both the text selection and the context menu.
On Android, the context menu takes priority over text selection, so this
has no effect (i.e. if the context menu is shown, then the AccessibleCaret
code never even gets the eMouseLongTap event). Also on Android nothing
else relies on the cancellation of the eMouseLongTap event, so this change
is a no-op.
MozReview-Commit-ID: peFzB2afha
This patch is really two separate changes.
The first change is that rust crates are large, standalone entities that
may contain multitudes of source files. It therefore doesn't make sense
to keep them in SOURCES, as we have been doing. Moving to use cargo
will require a higher-level approach, which suggests that we need a
different, higher-level representation for Rust sources in the build
system.
The representation here is to have the build system refer to things
defined in Cargo.toml files as the entities dealt with in the build
system, and let Cargo deal with the details of actually building things.
This approach means that adding a new crate to an existing library just
requires editing Rust and Cargo.toml files, rather than dealing with
moz.build, which seems more natural to Rust programmers. By having the
source files for libraries (and binaries in subsequent iterations of
this support) checked in to the tree, we can also take advantage of
Cargo.lock files.
The second is that we switch the core build system over to building via
cargo, rather than invoking rustc directly.
We also clean up a number of leftover things from the Old Way of doing
things. A number of tests are added to confirm that we'll only permit
crates to be built that have dependencies in-tree.
rlibs are going to be less important once we start building with cargo:
the focus will move to crates instead, so that's what we should call the
moz.build object.
Through an oversight, we listed librul.a twice when linking libxul: once
as part of the "objects" we were linking, and once as a static library.
This duplication is unnecessary and would cause problems later when we
try to generate librul.a via cargo, as cargo will put it someplace
different from where we expect and the two names will conflict. Let's
have rules.mk be the single source of truth for how librul.a is named,
and then the code to link libxul can simply refer to that name.
Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Nathan Froyd
Ben Kelly
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Kartikaya Gupta
Jeff Gilbert
Sebastian Hengst
Bobby Holley
Michael Layzell
Nils Ohlmeier [:drno]
Neil Deakin