In the new setup, all per-interface DOM binding files are exported into
mozilla/dom. General files not specific to an interface are also exported into
mozilla/dom.
In terms of namespaces, most things now live in mozilla::dom. Each interface
Foo that has generated code has a mozilla::dom::FooBinding namespace for said
generated code (and possibly a mozilla::bindings::FooBinding_workers if there's
separate codegen for workers).
IDL enums are a bit weird: since the name of the enum and the names of its
entries all end up in the same namespace, we still generate a C++ namespace
with the name of the IDL enum type with "Values" appended to it, with a
::valuelist inside for the actual C++ enum. We then typedef
EnumFooValues::valuelist to EnumFoo. That makes it a bit more difficult to
refer to the values, but means that values from different enums don't collide
with each other.
The enums with the proto and constructor IDs in them now live under the
mozilla::dom::prototypes and mozilla::dom::constructors namespaces respectively.
Again, this lets us deal sanely with the whole "enum value names are flattened
into the namespace the enum is in" deal.
The main benefit of this setup (and the reason "Binding" got appended to the
per-interface namespaces) is that this way "using mozilla::dom" should Just
Work for consumers and still allow C++ code to sanely use the IDL interface
names for concrete classes, which is fairly desirable.
--HG--
rename : dom/bindings/Utils.cpp => dom/bindings/BindingUtils.cpp
rename : dom/bindings/Utils.h => dom/bindings/BindingUtils.h
This patch moves some stuff that needs to be done for every item up to the front of the function, then checks to
see if the item is being added in an area that's already opaque and visible. If so (and assuming the
color-layer optimization has already been disabled), none of the rest of the method would do anything so we
can exit early. In particular we avoid calling IsUniform and GetOpaqueRegion on the item, and we also avoid
some expensive region manipulation.
Currently we return an extra out parameter on GetOpaqueRegion. This is ugly and it's also going to be inefficient
because in a followup patch I'm going to avoid calls to GetOpaqueRegion, but we still need to know whether the item
needs a transparent surface. So this patch removes that out parameter. Instead, we rely on the fact that only
Windows' glass-window-background display item needs to force a transparent surface, and there can only be one
of those per window. So we store a reference to it in the nsDisplayListBuilder if there is one, and then we can
efficiently tell if any leaf display item is the one that forces a transparent surface. For display items that
wrap a list, we continue to store whether they need to force a transparent surface in a boolean in the list.
Nicholas Cameron
Eitan Isaacson
Boris Zbarsky
Robert O'Callahan
Max Li
Landry Breuil
Ehsan Akhgari
Philipp von Weitershausen
Jose Antonio Olivera Ortega
Matt Brubeck
Bobby Holley
Asaf Romano
Ted Mielczarek