- XamarinPreprocessorVisitor handled processing/generating availability
attributes but needs to be removed as it depends on PMCS
- Because processing was handled at a preprocessor/token level before and
now inside generator.cs a number of changes were needed avoid checking
in a million line diff (literally)
- This commit creates a "shadow" set of availability attributes, with
the desired names [Mac] [Watch] [NoTV], etc when not in existence before
- Instead of adding hundreds of using statements to force resolution of these
shadow types, I abuse C# type resolution by storing them in the root
(not namespaced) so they are resolved first.
- generator-attributes-manager was taught how to process the multitude of
old-style attributes and how to generate the new-style attributes
- Generator's bug57070 is no longer valid, since we _can_ and do convert [iOS]
- Remove PMCS injection of command line arguments. Handled directly by Makefile
- Classic iOS is still building for now due to documentation issues but will be removed at a later date.
We can't trust Apple's native linker to pick the right (non private)
framework when an older TargetVersion is used. It just prefer what's
available - even if specified with a WeakFramework :(
That was already dealt with for applications. However the native linking
of the Xamarin.Sdk.framework (code sharing with extensions) is done with
the `LinkTask` instead of the `NativeLinkTask` so it did not have the
"auto correct" code.
Unit test added.
reference:
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=61039
There are a number of availability constructs that were uncommon enough / difficult to handle in the generator update or dead simple enough to change.
Some of them include:
- Multiple platforms |'ed into one Availability attributes.
- 32-bit arch Availability attributes were really uncommon and hand processing allowed
them to be skipped completely
- Convert Since, MavericksAttribute/MountainLionAttribute/LionAttribute, and a bunch of Availability (Introduced) to short forms like [Mac] and [iOS].
I also had to patch PMCS to correctly handle PlatformArchitecture arguments, which is ironic because a PR soon after this will delete all of that code.
* [Debugger] Allow to step into Xamarin code.
The tool now detects the different sources and mangles the path to
ensure that the correct paths are installed in the following location:
/Library/Frameworks/Xamarin.iOS/Versions/Current/src
/Library/Frameworks/Xamarin.Mac/Versions/Current/src
The tool will detect if the path map command was used in the mdb and pub files, will point to the correct source code and will copy it to the installation dir.
Tests have been added that will be ran both by wrench and jenkins ensuring that changes in the manglers do not change it behaviour.
* [MetalPerformanceShaders] Activate bindings for Xamarin.Mac and add n… (#2816)
* [MetalPerformaceShaders] Several MPSCnnKernel properties should be readonly (#2938)
The subclasses versions of the properties need Override, cannot be removed since it would break visibility for iOS 10
* Remove some [Model] attributes that sholdn't be needed
* Fix introspection test crashes
* More introspection fixes
* NN does not need to be PascalCased
Remove unneeded Models and BaseTypes
* PR Whitespace fixes and renamings
* Paste fail
* More fixes from PR comments
* [MPS] Adds new intro test, fixes ctors and xtro output
* Removes duplicated availability attributes.
* Removes obsoleted API from macOS since mps is new to it.
* Fixes xtro output.
* Adds missing API.
* Fixes parameterless ctors, some of them do not really work, found
by our new intro test and disabled the one that seem to not make
sense due to the presence of DesignatedInitializers.
* Fixes a selector typo.
* Adds new `ShouldNotExposeDefaultCtorTest` to intro.
ShouldNotExposeDefaultCtorTest
==============================
This test checks for types with a parameterless ctor that are subclasses
of `NSObject` and then cheks if the BaseType of said objects also expose
a parameterless ctor (all in .NET land), if this is not the case it reports
them and so they can manually audited. Also this test has the ability to
print alloc/init ObjC code by setting `genObjCTestCode` to `true` so you can
take this code into an Xcode project and easily tests the ctors.
It seems that xtro (sharpie) does not have a complete picture of when a ctor
must be exposed hence the hability to generate this code and manually test.
Right now this test is just enabled for MPS since it is the scope of this PR.
In the future it should be enabled for all other frameworks and the output be
manually audited.
* [MPS] Fixes premature collection possible in bindings (bug 59547) and implements feedback.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59547
* Fixes premature collection possible in bindings im MPSKernel.cs
* Fixes MPSImageHistogramTest from using deprecated API.
* Removes renamed selectors and typos from ApiSelectorTest and ApiTypoTest.
* [MPS] Reenable Copy API and DesignatedInitializer xtro feedback
* Implement more feedback
* More feedback
The parsing done by `System.Version` does not accept a major-only string,
e.g. providing "11" would throw an exception.
Since people generally refer version as iOS 11 (and not iOS 11.0) this
is, at best, a nuisance. Xcode toolchain accept "11" as a valid string.
The first part of message was updated to show both the option name and
the (user provided) value.
The 2nd part remain the text of the .net exception message, i.e. what
`Version.Parse` tells you when it validates the string. Seeing the input
value should make it more obvious for other, incorrect version strings.
reference:
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60280
* [mtouch/mmp/bgen] Add support for response files.
This is the first part of the fix for #56501.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=56501
* [tests] Make sure no single argument starting with a '@' is passed to mtouch unless it's a response file.
--assembly-build-target takes arguments starting with '@', for instance:
--assembly-build-target @all=framework
which does not work anymore, because that's interpreted as a response file
(mtouch tries to read the file '@all=framework', which obviously doesn't
exist).
The fix is simple, don't put a space between the two arguments:
--assembly-build-target=@all=framework
* Add --root-assembly to mtouch/mmp and make the MSBuild tasks use this new option.
This makes it possible to pass root assemblies starting with `@` to mtouch/mmp
without getting mistaken for response files.
* [msbuild] Always use the command-line option that takes an equals or colon.
Always use the command-line option that takes an equals or colon instead of a
space.
Do either of these:
--foo=something
--foo:something
instead of this:
--foo something
so that `something` can start with an at (`@`) sign without being mistaken for
a response file.
* [msbuild] Fix tests according to recent task changes.
* Update the function name used to initialize libmono-profiler-log, its called mono_profiler_init_log () now.
* [builds] Pass --with-cross-offsets= to crosstv's configure.
* Bump mono to 2017-08.
* Bump mono to 2017-08.
* Force disable 'futimens' and 'utimensat' so that we build with Xcode 9.
This is also needed to build with Xcode 8.3 on High Sierra.
* Remove old AppleTls implementation.
* Bump mono.
* Bump mono to 2017-08.
* Bump mono to 2017-08
* Reenable link-keep-resources-2 test
- This reverts commit 76b759ef22.
- 2017-08 has linker fix
* Bump mono to 2017-10
* Revert "Bump mono to 2017-10"
This reverts commit bb7832724e.
* Bump system mono to 2017-10
* Bump embedded mono to 2017-10
* [runtime] reflect eglib move
9be68f8952
* bump mono
* [btouch] remove Security.Tls usage from test
* [mtouch tests] update the function name used to initialize libmono-profiler-log, its called mono_profiler_init_log () now.
see
ea4e4a9ef6
fixes:
```
1) Failed : Xamarin.MTouch.Profiling(tvOS)
_mono_profiler_startup_log
Expected: collection containing "_mono_profiler_startup_log"
But was: < "_mono_profiler_init_log" >
at Xamarin.MTouch.Profiling (Xamarin.Profile profile) [0x00106] in <511889694a624cc9a50e0e9b259b05c5>:0
2) Failed : Xamarin.MTouch.Profiling(watchOS)
_mono_profiler_startup_log
Expected: collection containing "_mono_profiler_startup_log"
But was: < "_xamarin_get_block_descriptor", "_mono_profiler_init_log" >
at Xamarin.MTouch.Profiling (Xamarin.Profile profile) [0x00106] in <511889694a624cc9a50e0e9b259b05c5>:0
```
* [mmptest] update log profiler options.
826558a4af
deprecated the dash prefix for the mlpd path.
`noallocs` or `nocalls` are not needed, neither of them are default anymore.
* [mmptest] fix link-keep-resources-2 test to cope with more corlib resources.
another corlib resource (mscorlib.xml) was added:
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/11e95169e787#diff-2d1c64decd91d9a6e8842ab0f0e9438d
* Revert "[mmptest] fix link-keep-resources-2 test to cope with more corlib resources."
This reverts commit 350eb3c174.
* [XHarness] Add the Mono.Data.Tds tests.
* Address comments from rolf in the review.
* [mmp regresssion tests] bump mono linker, so mscorlib.xml gets stripped
the test was failing in that way:
> Executing link-keep-resources-2...
> [FAIL] i18n 4/2 data files present: charinfo.nlp, collation.core.bin, collation.tailoring.bin, mscorlib.xml
also update the output, because it's actually expected at least three
elements.
fixes: https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59277
* bump mono
fixes crash in tvOS: https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/5812
* bump mono for updated BCL tests
see https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/5820
* [mono] set 2017-10 branch in .gitmodules
* [macos] Fix guiunit error on clean builds by depending on correct copy (#2912)
* [macos] Fix guiunit error on clean builds by depending on correct copy
- From a clean build making a BCL test would error due to the non-mobile guiunit not being built
- This was because the Makefile-mac.inc target was incorrect
- This was because xharness assumed that non variation based targets were always Modern
- However, BCL tests are Full, not Modern
* Code review change
* Swap to var to reduce diff
* Revert changes in the paths for GuiUnit.
* [XHarness] Add the System.IO.Compression bcl tests. (#2918)
* [XHarness] Add the System.IO.Compression bcl tests.
* [XHarness] Add bcl tests for System.IO.Compression.FileSystem. (#2924)
* [XHarness] Add the System.IO.Compression bcl tests.
* Ensure that resources are correctly copied in the bundles.
* [XHarness] Add bcl tests for System.IO.Compression.FileSystem.
* As per review, make the Mac test app name match the tests that are ran.
* [XHarness] Add Mono.CSharp tests on ios. (#2927)
* [XHarness] Add Mono.CSharp tests on ios.
* Bump mono to bring changes in the mono.csharp tests.
* [xtro-sharpie] fix TypeDefinition access due to Cecil change
* Bump mono
* bump mono
fixes
- https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60480
- https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60482
* bump mono
more fixes around conflicting paths when tests are run in parallel.
* Bump for mono/mono@2017-10
Don't assume that a marked method has a caller, since a method can be marked
from XML as well.
This fixes a NullReferenceException:
> error : Could not link assemblies.
> Type: `System.Reflection.RuntimeParameterInfo`
> Assembly: `mscorlib, Version=2.0.5.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7cec85d7bea7798e`
> Reason: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
> --- inner exception
> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object (Aufgaben-ID: 165)
> at MonoTouch.Tuner.MonoTouchMarkStep.MarkMethod (Mono.Cecil.MethodReference reference) [0x0004f] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MonoTouch.Tuner/MonoTouchMarkStep.cs:105
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.MarkMethodCollection (System.Collections.IEnumerable methods) [0x00017] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:1163
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.MarkMethods (Mono.Cecil.TypeDefinition type) [0x0000b] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:1157
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.MobileMarkStep.MarkMethods (Mono.Cecil.TypeDefinition type) [0x0000b] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MobileMarkStep.cs:123
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.ApplyPreserveInfo (Mono.Cecil.TypeDefinition type) [0x0004a] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:1102
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x001ee] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:607
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.MobileMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MobileMarkStep.cs:71
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.CoreMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00046] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/CoreMarkStep.cs:156
> at MonoTouch.Tuner.MonoTouchMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MonoTouch.Tuner/MonoTouchMarkStep.cs:84
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x0007d] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:566
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.MobileMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MobileMarkStep.cs:71
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.CoreMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00046] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/CoreMarkStep.cs:156
> at MonoTouch.Tuner.MonoTouchMarkStep.MarkType (Mono.Cecil.TypeReference reference) [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MonoTouch.Tuner/MonoTouchMarkStep.cs:84
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.InitializeType (Mono.Cecil.TypeDefinition type) [0x0005b] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:94
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.InitializeAssembly (Mono.Cecil.AssemblyDefinition assembly) [0x00025] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:81
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.Initialize () [0x00016] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:73
> at Mono.Linker.Steps.MarkStep.Process (Mono.Linker.LinkContext context) [0x00008] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker.Steps/MarkStep.cs:66
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.MobileMarkStep.Process (Mono.Linker.LinkContext context) [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MobileMarkStep.cs:33
> at Xamarin.Linker.Steps.CoreMarkStep.Process (Mono.Linker.LinkContext context) [0x00017] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/CoreMarkStep.cs:26
> at MonoTouch.Tuner.MonoTouchMarkStep.Process (Mono.Linker.LinkContext context) [0x0001d] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/linker/MonoTouch.Tuner/MonoTouchMarkStep.cs:36
> at Mono.Linker.Pipeline.Process (Mono.Linker.LinkContext context) [0x00023] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/external/linker/linker/Mono.Linker/Pipeline.cs:128
> at MonoTouch.Tuner.Linker.Process (MonoTouch.Tuner.LinkerOptions options, MonoTouch.Tuner.MonoTouchLinkContext& context, System.Collections.Generic.List`1[Mono.Cecil.AssemblyDefinition]& assemblies) [0x000e0] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5481/2f8bbec0/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Tuning.cs:82
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60176
- https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60277
- Teach mmp and mtouch resolver to always ask for symbol reading from Cecil
- In most cases we explicitly load symbols (LoadReferencesStep) but when we don't rewritten assemblies don't match their pdb and we break debugging.
The registrar requires the availability attributes to work properly, which is
non-trivial when the linker is being used, because the linker runs before the
registrar, and will remove availability attributes.
For this reason we store the availability attributes separately when the
linker removes them so that the registrar can still find them, but
unfortunately it's not enough to store the CustomAttribute instance, because
it may end up crippled: if the attribute type itself is removed by the linker,
then it's not possible to get the attribute type from the CustomAttribute
instance, because 'attribute.Constructor.DeclaringType' returns null (the
linker sets the declaring type of the constructor to null).
Solution: store the attribute type separately; now we use a Tuple of
CustomAttribute and TypeReference.
Fixes this ugly exception:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
at XamCore.Registrar.Registrar.RegisterAssembly (Mono.Cecil.AssemblyDefinition assembly) [0x00146] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/src/ObjCRuntime/Registrar.cs:2316
at XamCore.Registrar.StaticRegistrar.Generate (System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[T] assemblies, System.String header_path, System.String source_path) [0x00035] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/tools/common/StaticRegistrar.cs:4197
at Xamarin.Bundler.RunRegistrarTask.Execute () [0x00001] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/BuildTasks.mtouch.cs:154
The registrar requires the availability attributes to work properly, which is
non-trivial when the linker is being used, because the linker runs before the
registrar, and will remove availability attributes.
For this reason we store the availability attributes separately when the
linker removes them so that the registrar can still find them, but
unfortunately it's not enough to store the CustomAttribute instance, because
it may end up crippled: if the attribute type itself is removed by the linker,
then it's not possible to get the attribute type from the CustomAttribute
instance, because 'attribute.Constructor.DeclaringType' returns null (the
linker sets the declaring type of the constructor to null).
Solution: store the attribute type separately; now we use a Tuple of
CustomAttribute and TypeReference.
Fixes this ugly exception:
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
at XamCore.Registrar.Registrar.RegisterAssembly (Mono.Cecil.AssemblyDefinition assembly) [0x00146] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/src/ObjCRuntime/Registrar.cs:2316
at XamCore.Registrar.StaticRegistrar.Generate (System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable`1[T] assemblies, System.String header_path, System.String source_path) [0x00035] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/tools/common/StaticRegistrar.cs:4197
at Xamarin.Bundler.RunRegistrarTask.Execute () [0x00001] in /work/maccore/master/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/BuildTasks.mtouch.cs:154
This avoids a problem where our code would store null because LinkContext
wasn't created yet when the static registrar instance was created.
This fixes the missing error from bug #59617.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59617
* [registrar] Remove useless interface.
* [registrar] Don't store LinkContext in the static registrar when in can be fetched from the Target. Partially fixes#59617.
This avoids a problem where our code would store null because LinkContext
wasn't created yet when the static registrar instance was created.
This fixes the missing error from bug #59617.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59617
* [registrar] Don't verify the SDK for protocol members. Partially fixes#59617.
It's not needed, because protocol members don't end up in the registrar output
anyway (and would thus not prevent the registrar code from compiling).
Classes that implement any protocol members would still run into the SDK
check, so this should not prevent real problematic code from being reported
either.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59617
* [tests][mtouch] Fix tests after registrar changes.
It does not make sense to create Xamarin.iOS projects that don't reference
Xamarin.iOS.dll, so make this an explicit error.
This fixes a NullReferenceException which could (when building for device, or
when not using simlauncher) occur, and instead shows the MT0123 error.
> MTOUCH : error MT0000: Unexpected error - Please file a bug report at http://bugzilla.xamarin.com
> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Target.GatherFrameworks () [0x00065] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/common/Target.cs:122
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Target.ProcessAssemblies () [0x000c2] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Target.cs:802
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Application.ProcessAssemblies () [0x0002f] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Application.cs:1407
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Application.BuildManaged () [0x00001] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Application.cs:831
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Application+<>c.<BuildAll>b__134_1 (Xamarin.Bundler.Application v) [0x00000] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Application.cs:779
> at System.Collections.Generic.List`1[T].ForEach (System.Action`1[T] action) [0x00024] in <48b95f3df5804531818f80e28ec60191>:0
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Application.BuildAll () [0x00050] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/Application.cs:779
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Driver.Main2 (System.String[] args) [0x00481] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/mtouch.cs:1420
> at Xamarin.Bundler.Driver.Main (System.String[] args) [0x0000f] in /Users/builder/data/lanes/5024/152b654a/source/xamarin-macios/tools/mtouch/mtouch.cs:945
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59798
We already have this logic for frameworks we detect according to the namespace
of the used types, but not for frameworks we detect from P/Invokes.
Fix this by using the same framework exclusion logic for frameworks detected
from P/Invokes: don't link with frameworks not available in the current SDK.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
We already have this logic for frameworks we detect according to the namespace
of the used types, but not for frameworks we detect from P/Invokes.
Fix this by using the same framework exclusion logic for frameworks detected
from P/Invokes: don't link with frameworks not available in the current SDK.
https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
Timothy Risi
Sebastien Pouliot
Chris Hamons
Manuel de la Pena
Vincent Dondain
Rolf Bjarne Kvinge
Bernhard Urban
Sebastien Pouliot
Luis Aguilera