зеркало из
1
0
Форкнуть 0
dotnet-foundation-projects/meetings/2020-09-10.md

4.8 KiB
Исходник Постоянная ссылка Ответственный История

Project Committee Meeting - September 10, 2020, 12:00 PM ET

ATTENDEES: Eriawan Kusumawardhono (@eriawan), Tanner Gooding (@tannergooding), Chris Sfanos (@ChrisSfanos), Juan Elosegui (@jmelosegui), Shaun Walker (@sbwalker), Chris Hammond (@ChrisHammond),

BOARD MEMBER: Jeff Strauss (@jstrauss)

ABSENT: Scott Willhite (@mrswoop),), Jeremy Sinclair (@snickler), Claire Novotny (@clairernovotny),

STAFF OBSERVERS: Terracia King (@terraciaking)

AGENDA

  1. MONTHLY PROGRESS UPDATE
  • Nanoframework
    • The Board of Directors agreed to accept the Project Committees recommendation and approve Nanoframework s application last month.
  • nopCommerence
    • @sbwalker sent feedback to the projects maintainer to explain that due to non-permissive licensing, the Foundation will currently not be able to approve the projects application. The application has been closed.
  1. REVIEW NEW PROJECT APPLICATIONS
  • Esquio
    • reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
    • activity metrics indicate this project is fairly mature ( active, multiple contributors )
    • licensing check indicated that they are licensed under Apache 2 which is permissive.
    • recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Esquio to the Board for membership.
  • Xamarian Community Toolkit
    • reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
    • activity metrics indicate this project is mature ( started in 2016, active, commit count is low compared to other projects )
    • licensing check indicated that they are licensed under MIT which is permissive.
    • recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Xamarian Community Toolkit to the Board for membership
  • DataGrid Extensions
    • reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
    • activity metrics indicate this project is mature however 1 contributor has done 99% of the commits
    • licensing check indicated that they are licensed under MIT which is permissive.
    • @sbwalker stated that the Project Committee can recommend the project for approcal but also reach out to the maintainer and encourage them to try to solicit more contributors
    • recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Datagrid Extensions to the Board for membership
  • C# standardization: ECMA TC49 – TG2
    • not an Open Source project currently
    • is work being done as a Standards Committee as part of ECMA and is primarily comprised of documentation
    • the Standards Committee would like the project to become an official member then go through the motions of making it an Open Source project.
    • the standard is already public, but they would like to make the communication and work to made public in the next phase.
    • @tannergooding recommended that the Project Committee reach out to the C# Standardization project maintainer to ask how they plan on coordinating with C# Language prior to sending them for Board approval.
    • recommendation: The Projects Committee will defer the decision for recommendation to next month to gather more information.
    • action item: Projects Committee to ask C# Standardizations project maintainer how they plan to coordinate with C# Language Team.
    • action item: @sbwalker to present the Projects Committees recommendations and the deferred project to the Board at the September 17th, 2020 Board Meeting.
  1. PROJECT
  • SixLabors/ImageSharp
    • @sbwalker followed up with the project maintainer of ImageSharp to determine next steps and has not received a response. This item remains open.
  • DNF Projects Site – Projects Trends
  • Projects Committee Charter
    • the Projects Committee adjusted the charter to replace the word "health" with "activity" ( the Committee has never evaluated project "health" - only public metrics on Github )
  • Nuget Package Ranking Discussion
    • Project Committee met previously with Jon Douglas from Nuget about a new proposed package ranking system
    • Nuget wants to create an algorithm to consider the popularity, recent activity, and quality of packages
    • Projects Committee was asked to provide feedback and continue collaboration on this topic
  • Project Benefits
    • @tannergooding provided an update on the list of project benefits started in GitHub.
    • action item: @tannergooding to meet with @clairenovotny to understand how to open this discussion to the broader community
  • Open Source Licensing
    • @Eriawan led the discussion on Open Source licensing.
    • @Eriawan had created a proposal for suggested permissive licensing to present to the Board.
    • @jstrauss suggested that the Projects Committee create a list of licenses that are not accepted.
  1. Q&A

The meeting adjourned at 1:03 pm ET