72 строки
4.8 KiB
Markdown
72 строки
4.8 KiB
Markdown
Project Committee Meeting - September 10, 2020, 12:00 PM ET
|
||
|
||
ATTENDEES: Eriawan Kusumawardhono (@eriawan), Tanner Gooding (@tannergooding), Chris Sfanos (@ChrisSfanos), Juan Elosegui (@jmelosegui), Shaun Walker (@sbwalker), Chris Hammond (@ChrisHammond),
|
||
|
||
BOARD MEMBER: Jeff Strauss (@jstrauss)
|
||
|
||
ABSENT: Scott Willhite (@mrswoop),), Jeremy Sinclair (@snickler), Claire Novotny (@clairernovotny),
|
||
|
||
STAFF OBSERVERS: Terracia King (@terraciaking)
|
||
|
||
AGENDA
|
||
|
||
1. MONTHLY PROGRESS UPDATE
|
||
|
||
- Nanoframework
|
||
- The Board of Directors agreed to accept the Project Committee’s recommendation and approve Nanoframework’ s application last month.
|
||
- nopCommerence
|
||
- @sbwalker sent feedback to the project’s maintainer to explain that due to non-permissive licensing, the Foundation will currently not be able to approve the project’s application. The application has been closed.
|
||
|
||
2. REVIEW NEW PROJECT APPLICATIONS
|
||
|
||
- Esquio
|
||
- reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
|
||
- activity metrics indicate this project is fairly mature ( active, multiple contributors )
|
||
- licensing check indicated that they are licensed under Apache 2 which is permissive.
|
||
- recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Esquio to the Board for membership.
|
||
- Xamarian Community Toolkit
|
||
- reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
|
||
- activity metrics indicate this project is mature ( started in 2016, active, commit count is low compared to other projects )
|
||
- licensing check indicated that they are licensed under MIT which is permissive.
|
||
- recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Xamarian Community Toolkit to the Board for membership
|
||
- DataGrid Extensions
|
||
- reviewed activity metrics and eligibility criteria
|
||
- activity metrics indicate this project is mature however 1 contributor has done 99% of the commits
|
||
- licensing check indicated that they are licensed under MIT which is permissive.
|
||
- @sbwalker stated that the Project Committee can recommend the project for approcal but also reach out to the maintainer and encourage them to try to solicit more contributors
|
||
- recommendation: Project Committee agreed to recommend Datagrid Extensions to the Board for membership
|
||
- C# standardization: ECMA TC49 – TG2
|
||
- not an Open Source project currently
|
||
- is work being done as a Standards Committee as part of ECMA and is primarily comprised of documentation
|
||
- the Standards Committee would like the project to become an official member then go through the motions of making it an Open Source project.
|
||
- the standard is already public, but they would like to make the communication and work to made public in the next phase.
|
||
- @tannergooding recommended that the Project Committee reach out to the C# Standardization project maintainer to ask how they plan on coordinating with C# Language prior to sending them for Board approval.
|
||
- recommendation: The Projects Committee will defer the decision for recommendation to next month to gather more information.
|
||
- action item: Projects Committee to ask C# Standardization’s project maintainer how they plan to coordinate with C# Language Team.
|
||
- action item: @sbwalker to present the Projects Committee’s recommendations and the deferred project to the Board at the September 17th, 2020 Board Meeting.
|
||
|
||
3. PROJECT
|
||
|
||
- SixLabors/ImageSharp
|
||
- @sbwalker followed up with the project maintainer of ImageSharp to determine next steps and has not received a response. This item remains open.
|
||
- DNF Projects Site – Projects Trends
|
||
- URL: https://dnfprojects.azurewebsites.net/net-foundation-projects
|
||
- @sbwalker provided an update on the application for daily tracking of activity metrics.
|
||
- @sbwalker outlined the feedback received on Twitter and adjustments made to the application
|
||
- Projects Committee Charter
|
||
- the Projects Committee adjusted the charter to replace the word "health" with "activity" ( the Committee has never evaluated project "health" - only public metrics on Github )
|
||
- Nuget Package Ranking Discussion
|
||
- Project Committee met previously with Jon Douglas from Nuget about a new proposed package ranking system
|
||
- Nuget wants to create an algorithm to consider the popularity, recent activity, and quality of packages
|
||
- Projects Committee was asked to provide feedback and continue collaboration on this topic
|
||
- Project Benefits
|
||
- @tannergooding provided an update on the list of project benefits started in GitHub.
|
||
- action item: @tannergooding to meet with @clairenovotny to understand how to open this discussion to the broader community
|
||
- Open Source Licensing
|
||
- @Eriawan led the discussion on Open Source licensing.
|
||
- @Eriawan had created a proposal for suggested permissive licensing to present to the Board.
|
||
- @jstrauss suggested that the Projects Committee create a list of licenses that are not accepted.
|
||
|
||
4. Q&A
|
||
|
||
The meeting adjourned at 1:03 pm ET |